1. FSV Mainz 05
14:30
SC Paderborn 07
Match analysis
Model generatedNot enough history to call 1. FSV Mainz 05 vs SC Paderborn 07
The model projects 1.56 goals for 1. FSV Mainz 05 and 1.34 for SC Paderborn 07, giving 43% for the home win, 25% for the draw and 33% for the away win. Those rates come from attack and defence ratings fitted to 320 completed matches in this competition, weighted so recent results count for more.
On goals, 2.90 expected in total puts over 2.5 at 55% and both teams to score at 58%. The shape of the game favours backing goals rather than sitting on a result.
Recent form: 1. FSV Mainz 05 have taken 7 points from their last 6 (WLWLDL), scoring 9 and conceding 10. SC Paderborn 07 have 0 from 0 (), scoring 0 and conceding 0.
Across the last 1 meetings, 1. FSV Mainz 05 have won 1, SC Paderborn 07 0, with 0 drawn and 2.00 goals a game. Head-to-head is a small sample and the model treats it as context, not evidence.
- Most likely scoreline: 1-1 at 12%
- Expected goals: 1.56 - 1.34
- Clean sheet chance: 1. FSV Mainz 05 26%, SC Paderborn 07 21%
- Outcome spread is near-uniform — this is a genuinely open match
- One or both clubs have too few completed matches in the sample for a reliable rating.
Match result
1X2Odds shown are the model's fair price — what the bet would be worth with no bookmaker margin attached.
Goals
2.90 expectedHome xG
1.56
Away xG
1.34
Total
2.90
Both teams to score
BTTS58%
Yes
42%
No
Mainz clean sheet
SC Paderborn clean sheet
Double chance
Two outcomes coveredCorrect score
Most likely scorelines- 1-111.6%
- 2-19.0%
- 1-08.5%
- 1-27.7%
- 0-17.2%
- 2-06.7%
- 2-26.0%
- 0-05.6%
- 0-24.9%
- 3-14.7%
Correct score is a long shot by nature — even the likeliest scoreline here is well under evens.
This is a Weekend Pass feature.
Unlock Weekend PassRecent form
Most recent firstNo completed matches in the sample.
Head to head
Last 1 meetings1
Mainz
0
Draws
0
SC Paderborn
- 29 Feb 201. FSV Mainz 05 2-0 SC Paderborn 07
Head-to-head is context, not evidence. Squads turn over, and five meetings is far too small a sample to move a probability on its own — the model treats it that way.